(“Agreement”) is made this day of , 2021 (the “Effective Date”) by and between California-American Water Company, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as the “Company,” Monterey One Water (formerly the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency), hereinafter referred to as the “Agency,” and Monterey Peninsula WaterManagement District, hereinafter referred to as the “District.” The Company, the Agency, and the District are hereinafter referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
This Water Purchase Contract (“Contract”) for the sale and purchase of water was entered into on this 26th day of July, 2016, to be effective to the fullest extent permissible under applicable law as of June 30, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), by and among Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc., a Nevada corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Buyer”), and Rocky Mountain High Water Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as “Seller”). Buyer and Seller are referred to from time to time in this Agreement individually as a “Party,” and collectively as the “Parties.”
Water Purchase Agreement • June 14th, 2016 • California Contract Type June 14th, 2016 Jurisdiction Water Purchase Agreement • August 2nd, 2001 • Lake Area Ethanol Inc • South Dakota Contract Type August 2nd, 2001 Jurisdiction Water Purchase Agreement • September 21st, 2015 Contract Type September 21st, 2015, 2015 (“Agreement”) by and between California-American Water Company, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as the “Company,” Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency, hereinafter referred to as the “Agency,” and Monterey Peninsula Water Management District, hereinafter referred to as the “District.” Collectively, the Company, the Agency, and the District are hereinafter referred to as the “Parties.”
Water Purchase Agreement • June 30th, 1997 • Western Water Co • Real estate dealers (for their own account) • California
Contract Type June 30th, 1997 Jurisdiction Water Purchase Agreement • November 10th, 2015 • California Contract Type November 10th, 2015 Jurisdiction, 2015 (the “Effective Date”) by and between California-American Water Company, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as the “Company,” Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency, hereinafter referred to as the “Agency,” and Monterey Peninsula Water Management District, hereinafter referred to as the “District.” The Company, the Agency, and the District are hereinafter referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
Water Purchase Agreement • March 31st, 1997 • Birmingham Utilities Inc • Water supply • Connecticut Contract Type March 31st, 1997 Jurisdiction Water Purchase Agreement • March 31st, 2021 • Iowa Contract Type March 31st, 2021 JurisdictionTHIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 2021, by and between the City of Sibley, 808 3rd Ave., P.O. Box 126, Sibley, Iowa 51249, hereinafter referred to as “Seller” and the City of Harrisburg, 301 E. Willow St., Harrisburg, South Dakota 57032, hereinafter referred to as “Purchaser”, as follows:
Water Purchase Agreement • December 1st, 2021 • California Contract Type December 1st, 2021 Jurisdiction(“Agreement”) is made this day of , 2021 (the “Effective Date”) by and between California-American Water Company, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as the “Company,” Monterey One Water (formerly the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency), hereinafter referred to as the “Agency,” and Monterey Peninsula WaterManagement District, hereinafter referred to as the “District.” The Company, the Agency, and the District are hereinafter referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
Water Purchase Agreement • September 4th, 2014 • Kentucky Contract Type September 4th, 2014 JurisdictionTHIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this the 29111 day of July, 2014, by and between KENTUCKY-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY, a Kentucky corporation with offices at 2300 Richmond Road, Lexington, Kentucky 40502 ("KAW") and the CITY OF PARIS, 525 High Street, Paris, Kentucky 40361 ("Paris").
Water Purchase Agreement • March 2nd, 2021 Contract Type March 2nd, 2021THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 2021, by and between the City of Sibley, 808 3rd Ave., P.O. Box 126, Sibley, Iowa 51249, hereinafter referred to as “Seller” and the City of Harrisburg, 301 E. Willow St., Harrisburg, South Dakota 57032, hereinafter referred to as “Purchaser”, as follows:
Water Purchase Agreement • October 2nd, 2017 Contract Type October 2nd, 2017This Water Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 11th day of June , 2019, by and between the CITY OF DAWSON
Water Purchase Agreement • May 5th, 2020 • California Contract Type May 5th, 2020 JurisdictionThe Water Purchase Agreement is complex and detailed. It specifies the duties and responsibilities of Cal-Am, MCWD, and MCWRA, with regard to ownership, construction, maintenance, and operation of the facilities included in the Regional Project. It also specifies the financing and cost responsibilities of each entity. We summarize the major provisions of the Water Purchase Agreement here, describe DRA and MPWMD's concerns, and discuss our disposition of the objections.
Water Purchase Agreement • October 12th, 2016 Contract Type October 12th, 2016 Customers are billed in advance and must pay for bulk water with cash or check only at the Finance Department at Town Hall (221 S Nursery Ave.) before filling up their trucks.
Water Purchase Agreement • December 3rd, 2012 Contract Type December 3rd, 2012Abstract. The San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) should not sign the water purchase agreement (WPA) with Poseidon Resources, due to its economic, social and logistical flaws. The first flaw is cost: water costing $2,000+ per acre foot will either be sold at a lower price (due to average cost pricing), such that SDCWA “buys high and sells low” or it will be sold at its marginal cost. In this latter case of setting the price of all water to reflect the most-expensive source (marginal cost pricing), we can expect that quantity demanded will fall to a level at which the desalinated water would not be necessary. The second flaw is social: the desalinated water will only improve local reliability if it’s sold at marginal prices (meaning it would not be necessary). If it’s sold at lower prices and/or delivered to new housing in the region, then SDCWA is losing money on the deal and/or subsidizing new development at the expense of existing customers. Third, the WPA is too complicated to under
Water Purchase Agreement • April 19th, 2005 Contract Type April 19th, 2005 Water Purchase Agreement • June 17th, 2015 Contract Type June 17th, 2015 Water Purchase Agreement • July 30th, 2015 Contract Type July 30th, 2015and Sewer District, P.O. Box 827, Whitesburg, Kentucky 41858, (hereinafter referred to as the "Seller"), and The City of Neon with an address of , j Neon, Kentucky 41840(hereinafter referred to as the "Purchaser").
Water Purchase Agreement • August 27th, 2015 Contract Type August 27th, 2015Water Purchase Agreement • August 14th, 2002 • Great Plains Ethanol LLC • Industrial organic chemicals • South Dakota
Contract Type August 14th, 2002 JurisdictionTHIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 24th day of May, 2002, by and between South Lincoln Rural Water System, Inc., a South Dakota corporation, of Box 155, Canton, South Dakota, 57013, hereinafter referred to as “South Lincoln” and Great Plains Ethanol, L.L.C., a South Dakota corporation, of , hereinafter referred to as “Great Plains”, as follows: